Justice Kant used a musical metaphor for the existing situation, stating that justice should not resemble “a set of instruments producing harmonious notes in isolation but discordant sounds when played together.” He urged courts to operate as a “judicial symphony,” guided by a common constitutional score. He described the call for uniform policy and institutional framework as a constructive way to reinforce predictability in judicial approach across the country.
The Chief Justice also argued that strengthening infrastructure — not just physical buildings, but also technological, administrative and human systems — is essential to bridge the gap between constitutional promise and citizens’ experience of justice. He identified delays, cost, language barriers and distance as persistent impediments for many, especially those on the margins, undermining access to justice.
Justice Kant highlighted the role of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms such as mediation and institutional arbitration, noting that these have increasingly become central pillars of dispute resolution. He suggested that these can offer less intimidating, more efficient and responsive alternatives to traditional litigation, helping relieve court burdens and speeding up access to justice. The adoption of technology — digital filing, virtual hearings, multilingual platforms and case-management tools — has already started to democratise access, though the CJI cautioned that such tools must remain inclusive for those lacking resources or connectivity.
The call for coherent judicial policy and improved infrastructure comes as the country grapples with widespread case pendency and structural inefficiencies in courts. The suggestion by the CJI aims to ensure that the judiciary can deliver justice in a more predictable, equitable and accessible manner across all courts, reinforcing its role as guardian of the Constitution.