ASI officials claimed their efforts were aligned with legal obligations to preserve heritage properties and determine whether modifications adhered to guidelines. Alterations to the mosque, particularly to its outer façade and prayer areas, raised concerns over potential violations of conservation rules governing historical landmarks. However, mosque officials refuted claims of unauthorized work, asserting that all renovations were conducted with respect to religious traditions and community needs.
The inspection process took a contentious turn as several community leaders questioned the impartiality of the survey, suggesting it might be politically motivated. They alleged that the timing of the inspection coincided with broader regional tensions, exacerbating fears of communal disharmony. Protesters rallied outside the mosque, urging authorities to ensure transparency and impartiality in the ASI’s activities.
Local law enforcement, anticipating unrest, deployed a significant police force to maintain order. Despite efforts to mediate, sporadic clashes between protesters and law enforcement were reported. The district administration expressed concerns about escalating tensions and appealed to both parties to prioritize dialogue. Security measures, including barricades and patrols, were reinforced in the vicinity to prevent further confrontations.
Experts in heritage conservation have pointed out the increasing sensitivity surrounding surveys of religious structures, especially in a socio-political climate marked by heightened communal anxieties. The mosque's historical significance has added another layer of complexity, as its preservation is seen as a symbol of cultural plurality. Several conservationists emphasized the importance of engaging local communities in heritage-related activities to foster trust and collaboration.
Meanwhile, local politicians entered the fray, voicing contrasting perspectives on the issue. Some leaders from opposition parties criticized the ASI for what they termed an aggressive approach, urging a more inclusive dialogue with community stakeholders. Others called for a balanced investigation to ensure compliance with heritage laws without infringing on religious freedoms.
The incident has drawn attention to the broader challenges of managing heritage properties intertwined with religious practices. Analysts argue that the balancing act between preservation and community sentiments requires nuanced policy-making and sustained engagement with diverse stakeholders.