In a recent address, Bhagwat expressed concern over individuals attempting to become "leaders of Hindus" by reviving temple-mosque disputes, particularly following the construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. He stated, "No one will become a leader of Hindus by raking up temple-mosque disputes and spreading communal divide." This perspective aligns with the RSS's broader objective of fostering social harmony and national integration.
Contrastingly, *Organiser* has featured a cover story and editorial advocating for the exploration of historical truths concerning disputed religious sites. The publication argues that denying access to such historical information equates to "denying the right to know the truth," suggesting that uncovering these truths is essential for civilizational justice. This stance reflects a segment within the RSS that believes acknowledging historical narratives is crucial for cultural identity and justice.
The divergence between Bhagwat's caution and *Organiser*'s advocacy has sparked discussions within the RSS and among its affiliates. Some spiritual leaders and seers have openly criticized Bhagwat's remarks. Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati commented, "Mohan Bhagwat has claimed that some people raise these issues to become leaders, but I want to clarify that ordinary Hindus do not aspire to become leaders." Similarly, the Akhil Bharatiya Sant Samiti expressed that decisions on religious matters should be determined by religious leaders rather than the RSS.
This internal debate occurs against a backdrop of legal petitions by Hindu groups seeking the demolition of mosques they claim were built on temple sites, such as the Shahi Jama Masjid in Uttar Pradesh's Sambhal district. These actions have led to communal tensions and legal challenges, prompting leaders like Bhagwat to advise against escalating such disputes.
The RSS, founded in 1925, has historically played a significant role in India's socio-political landscape, promoting Hindu cultural values and nationalism. The current discourse within the organization reflects a balancing act between acknowledging historical grievances and promoting contemporary social cohesion.
Analysts observe that this situation highlights the complexities within the RSS as it attempts to address historical narratives while maintaining its commitment to national unity. The differing viewpoints suggest an ongoing negotiation within the organization regarding the best approach to reconcile past injustices with present-day societal harmony.
As the debate continues, the RSS's approach to temple-mosque disputes will likely influence its relationship with various Hindu groups and its role in India's broader socio-political context. The organization's ability to navigate these internal differences will be crucial in shaping its future direction and impact on national discourse.