Congress has raised alarm over what it describes as an unprecedented threat to India’s Constitution, accusing Home Minister Amit Shah of demeaning B.R. Ambedkar in Parliament. The political party claimed Shah's remarks reflect the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh's (RSS) long-standing efforts to weaken the constitutional framework crafted by Ambedkar.
The controversy erupted when Shah, during a speech in Parliament, seemingly dismissed Ambedkar's role in shaping India's democratic principles. The Home Minister's remarks, which many interpreted as a critique of Ambedkar’s legacy, have sparked outrage across political circles, particularly among opposition leaders and Dalit groups. Congress has called these comments part of a broader, concerted effort by the BJP and RSS to undermine constitutional values, with their attack on Ambedkar being the latest step in this strategy.
The BJP, on the other hand, has dismissed these accusations, claiming that Shah's comments were misconstrued. Party spokespersons argue that Shah was merely engaging in a political discourse, with no intention to denigrate Ambedkar or his contributions. However, the backlash has been swift, with several prominent figures from the Congress and other opposition parties voicing their concerns about what they see as an attempt to rewrite history.
Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge condemned Shah’s statements, saying they were part of a larger conspiracy to "distort" India's democratic roots. Kharge pointed out that Ambedkar's role in drafting the Constitution was pivotal in ensuring social justice and equality for all, particularly marginalized communities. He added that any effort to downplay or disparage Ambedkar’s legacy would undermine the very foundation of Indian democracy.
The Congress further alleged that the BJP's repeated attacks on Ambedkar were aligned with a wider RSS agenda to erase the contributions of key figures in India’s independence movement. The RSS, Congress contends, has long sought to promote a vision of India rooted in a different ideological framework—one that does not fully embrace the pluralistic and inclusive values enshrined in the Constitution. Congress leaders have warned that such efforts pose a grave threat to the unity and integrity of the nation.
The remarks also resonate with the broader political climate in India, where debates over caste, social justice, and secularism have intensified. The Congress party has seized upon these divisions, positioning itself as the defender of the Constitution and Ambedkar’s vision. By highlighting the BJP's perceived hostility toward Ambedkar, Congress aims to solidify its standing with Dalit and marginalized communities, who view Ambedkar as a champion of their rights.
Dalit rights activists have also strongly condemned Shah’s comments, with some calling for protests against the BJP. These groups argue that any attempt to downplay Ambedkar’s legacy is a direct attack on the social and political rights of Dalits and other marginalized communities. Ambedkar’s contributions, including his work in securing reservations for Dalits in education and government jobs, are seen as crucial steps toward achieving social equality in India. The attack on his legacy, activists warn, could have far-reaching consequences for Dalit rights.
While the controversy continues to generate political heat, experts suggest that the debate underscores the deepening ideological rifts within Indian politics. India’s Constitution, widely regarded as one of the most progressive in the world, has been a point of contention for years, with various factions vying to shape its interpretation. The current dispute over Ambedkar’s legacy could have significant ramifications, not just for the BJP and Congress, but for the broader political discourse surrounding the Constitution and its place in modern India.
The BJP’s positioning on the issue also speaks to the party's ongoing efforts to build a strong nationalist identity that appeals to a broader base, including both upper-caste Hindus and other sections of society. This identity, critics argue, has often come at the expense of India’s secular and inclusive ideals. The party’s emphasis on Hindutva and its challenges to the existing social order have led to accusations that it seeks to undermine the Constitution’s commitment to equality and social justice.
As the controversy over Shah's comments unfolds, it is clear that the stakes are high. For Congress, this is more than just a political skirmish; it is an opportunity to rally support around the Constitution and its foundational values. For the BJP, the issue represents another battleground in its ongoing struggle to reshape India’s political and ideological landscape.