Pitroda spoke following sharp criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party, who accused him of harbouring sympathy for Pakistan and demanded apologies from Congress’s top leadership—including Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi—for what they termed “anti-national” remarks.
Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera said he had not heard the full remarks initially attributed to Pitroda, but attacked the BJP for what he called hypocrisy. He pointed out that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh frequently invokes the concept of “Akhand Bharat”, yet objects when others speak about cultural connections with neighbouring countries. He argued that when someone outside BJP talks about such ties, they face backlash.
Pitroda explained that his intention was to draw attention to foreign policy based on mutual trust, regional stability, and influence rather than bravado. He maintained that strong institutions, respect for democratic values and minority rights, and mindful diplomacy should form the foundation of India’s international posture. He also acknowledged the pain caused by terrorism and conflict, reiterating that his remarks were neither meant to belittle suffering nor to undermine legitimate concerns about security.
The BJP reacted with anger, saying Pitroda’s remarks insulted Indian soldiers and the nation. Spokespersons such as Pradeep Bhandari criticised what they described as Congress’s “soft corner” for Pakistan, and accused the party of downplaying attacks and terror incidents attributed to Pakistan. Other BJP leaders labelled Congress “Islamabad National Congress”, arguing that the party had repeatedly been lenient toward Pakistan across issues like 26/11, Pulwama, Pahalgam, and cross-border incidents.