
Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath announced the renaming during a project review meeting, questioning the relevance of Mughal figures as Indian icons. He emphasized that symbols reflecting a "subservient mentality" have no place in contemporary Uttar Pradesh. Adityanath highlighted Agra's historical ties to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, noting that the Maratha leader was once held under house arrest in the city. This connection, according to the Chief Minister, justifies the museum's new dedication.
The museum project, initiated in 2015 under former Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav, aimed to showcase the art, culture, and history of the Mughal era. The foundation stone was laid in 2016, with an initial completion target of 2017. However, construction delays have pushed the timeline, and as of now, the museum remains under development.
Opposition parties have voiced criticism over the renaming. Samajwadi Party leader Wajid Nisar accused the current administration of lacking developmental vision, alleging that renaming projects initiated by previous governments serves as a facade for progress. He questioned the relevance of Shivaji to Agra, aside from his historical imprisonment. Similarly, Congress leader Shabbir Abbas suggested that such moves are politically motivated, aiming to influence voter sentiment ahead of upcoming elections.
Heritage experts and conservationists have also expressed concerns. Professor Farhat Hasan of Delhi University described the decision as indicative of a political vision that overlooks India's shared historical heritage and the significant contributions of the Mughal era to the nation's composite culture. Heritage conservationist Jayshree Shukla echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the profound impact of the Mughals on India's cultural and architectural legacy.
The museum, located near the eastern gate of the Taj Mahal, was designed by British architect David Chipperfield. Originally intended to present the political and cultural milestones of the Mughal era through its art and architecture, the museum's narrative is now expected to shift to highlight aspects of Hindu culture, particularly focusing on Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj's life and legacy.
This renaming aligns with a broader pattern observed in Uttar Pradesh under Adityanath's leadership, where several projects and places have been rebranded to reflect figures and symbols associated with Hindu heritage. Supporters argue that such changes reclaim and honor indigenous heroes, while critics view them as attempts to marginalize the diverse historical narratives that constitute India's rich tapestry.
As the museum's construction progresses, the discourse surrounding its renaming underscores the complex interplay between history, politics, and cultural identity in India. The decision continues to evoke diverse opinions, reflecting the nation's ongoing dialogue about its multifaceted heritage.