He highlighted that the Indian Supreme Court has continually evolved its practices to ensure that it remains "the people’s court." One significant measure he noted was the court’s dilution of the traditional locus standi rule, a legal principle that restricts who can bring cases to court. This change has allowed a broader section of the public to seek justice, even through informal means such as writing letters to the court. Chandrachud remarked that this reflects the court's ongoing efforts to break down procedural barriers that often prevent ordinary citizens from accessing justice.
Citing a specific case, Chandrachud mentioned the court's intervention on behalf of a young Dalit student whose dream of attending the prestigious Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) was jeopardized due to his inability to pay the admission fees on time. Using its constitutional authority under Article 142, the court directed the institution to grant the student admission, ensuring justice in line with its mandate of fairness and equity.
Further elaborating on the court's proactive stance, Chandrachud recalled another instance where the Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of a letter from a terminated judicial officer. Along with several other women judicial officers dismissed for not meeting probation disposal norms, the court's oversight led to their reinstatement. Such cases, according to the Chief Justice, demonstrate the court's commitment to the people and its readiness to exercise its powers to correct injustices, even in cases brought forward in non-conventional ways.
CJI Chandrachud also touched upon the larger philosophical approach of the judiciary, highlighting the distinction between judicial decisions and popular mandate. He explained that judges do not derive their legitimacy from public approval of their decisions but from their impartial and fair application of the law. The court’s interventions, especially in matters involving marginalized or vulnerable communities, reflect its resolve to uphold constitutional values while being cognizant of the social realities many individuals face.
Beyond individual cases, the Chief Justice discussed broader institutional reforms aimed at enhancing judicial accountability. The Indian judiciary has seen technological reforms in recent years, such as virtual hearings and e-filing systems, which have been particularly beneficial in enhancing accessibility during the pandemic. Chandrachud stressed that these technological advancements would play a crucial role in ensuring that justice is not just done but seen to be done in an efficient and timely manner.
Reflecting on the judiciary's long-term evolution, Chandrachud noted that while procedural formalities and bureaucratic red tape have historically been obstacles, reforms focused on accessibility and transparency have helped bridge the gap between the judiciary and the common citizen. The Chief Justice's remarks are part of a broader initiative by the Indian Supreme Court to make justice more inclusive, equitable, and responsive to the needs of the people, especially those from disadvantaged sections of society.