Leaders In Delhi Never Liked Me': Omar Abdullah Alleges Poll Conspiracy
Omar Abdullah, vice president of the National Conference and former Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, has raised serious allegations regarding interference in the upcoming state assembly elections. Speaking at a rally in the Ganderbal constituency, where he is contesting, Abdullah claimed that the BJP-led government at the Centre is intentionally backing independent candidates to sabotage his electoral chances.
The focus of Abdullah's accusation is the case of Sarjan Ahmad Wagay, a jailed separatist leader, who has filed his candidacy to run against him. According to Abdullah, this move is part of a larger conspiracy to undermine his influence in Jammu and Kashmir politics. The National Conference leader stated that he had noticed similar patterns during previous elections. For example, in the 2019 Baramulla Lok Sabha elections, Sheikh Abdul Rashid, another jailed leader, contested and defeated him while campaigning from prison, an incident Abdullah referred to during his speech.
Abdullah expressed his concern over the timing and nature of these events, implying that such actions were not coincidental but rather a coordinated effort to weaken his position in the region. "I always knew that Delhi would want to silence me," he said, suggesting that this strategy had been crafted specifically to challenge his leadership in Jammu and Kashmir. He went on to explain that after filing his nomination for Ganderbal, he received reports that Wagay, who hails from a different part of the region, would also be contesting from the same constituency, raising questions about the motives behind these developments.
This latest incident highlights Abdullah's broader struggle with what he perceives as attempts by the central government to curb his political influence. The National Conference leader emphasized that his opposition to Delhi is not just personal but represents the voice of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. He claimed that his vocal stance on issues concerning the region's dignity and autonomy made him a target of these conspiracies.
The involvement of jailed separatist leaders in electoral politics is a contentious issue in Jammu and Kashmir. Abdullah pointed out that these actions not only complicate the political landscape but also serve as a strategy to divide the opposition. The former chief minister asserted that the government's alleged plan to prop up candidates from prison is part of a broader effort to diminish the influence of mainstream political leaders like himself, particularly those who challenge New Delhi's policies in the region.
In his speech, Abdullah did not mince words, directly accusing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of orchestrating these moves to "silence" him. He mentioned that this is not the first time he has faced such political tactics and expressed his belief that these efforts are primarily designed to stop him from raising the concerns of the Kashmiri people on larger platforms.
The upcoming elections in Jammu and Kashmir are already fraught with tension, given the region's unique political dynamics and its fraught relationship with the central government. Abdullah's accusations have added another layer of complexity to an already sensitive electoral environment. His claims come at a time when Jammu and Kashmir is facing its first elections since the abrogation of Article 370, which stripped the region of its special status under the Indian Constitution. The National Conference, led by Abdullah and his father, Farooq Abdullah, has been a staunch opponent of the revocation of Article 370, making their party a key player in the upcoming elections.
Abdullah's remarks have sparked debate in political circles, with some analysts viewing them as an attempt to rally support ahead of the elections, while others see them as a reflection of the genuine challenges faced by mainstream politicians in the region. The presence of separatist leaders in the electoral fray further complicates matters, as it raises questions about the legitimacy and fairness of the process.