Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud strongly questioned Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal during the ongoing hearing of the RG Kar Medical College rape and murder case. The case, which has gained significant attention due to its complex nature, involves allegations of mishandling evidence and questions surrounding the actions of the police. The RG Kar case has shaken the medical community, with accusations of systemic failures and concerns regarding the safety of junior doctors.
During the latest hearing, CJI Chandrachud raised concerns over missing evidence, including incomplete CCTV footage that had been handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). According to Sibal, a 32GB drive with footage had been submitted to the CBI on August 14. However, the court demanded clarity on why only 27 minutes of video from the crime scene were initially made available, sparking outrage about possible evidence tampering.
The investigation into the horrific rape and murder of a medical student at RG Kar Medical College has already seen delays. The court was particularly alarmed by the lack of coordination between the Kolkata Police and the CBI. CJI Chandrachud called out the failures of the local authorities, emphasizing that such lapses could seriously jeopardize the investigation. He also expressed concerns about critical forensic evidence, such as the victim’s clothing, being mishandled, questioning why key items were not immediately sent for forensic examination.
Sibal, representing the West Bengal government, faced tough questions from the bench regarding the police's role and the potential destruction of evidence. The CJI did not hold back, making it clear that such omissions would not be tolerated in a case of this magnitude. The court has demanded more thorough cooperation from local police and urged the CBI to expedite its investigation without hindrances.
The ongoing case has drawn reactions from legal experts, activists, and medical professionals, many of whom have criticized the state’s handling of the investigation. Karuna Nundy, a prominent lawyer, voiced concerns about the safety of junior doctors, who have faced threats and intimidation since the incident came to light. She pointed out that many junior doctors are afraid to return to work, while senior doctors are overburdened. Nundy further criticized the vilification of these doctors, highlighting the structural issues within the healthcare system that this case has exposed.