The incident has sparked a wave of public outrage and has placed significant pressure on the authorities to ensure a thorough and transparent investigation. Dr. Ghosh, who resigned from his post at RG Kar Medical College citing moral responsibility, was astonishingly appointed as the principal of Calcutta National Medical College within just 12 hours of his resignation. This swift reappointment has raised eyebrows and led to a slew of public interest litigations (PILs) being filed, questioning the integrity of the appointment process and the possible implications for the ongoing investigation.
During a hearing, the Calcutta High Court expressed its dismay over the state's decision to reappoint Dr. Ghosh so quickly, especially given the gravity of the allegations surrounding the case. The court has been particularly vocal about the need for the state to address the concerns of the protesting medical fraternity, who are demanding justice for their deceased colleague.
The parents of the deceased doctor, who have been granted an intervention by the court, have voiced their dissatisfaction with the hospital's handling of the case. They allege that they were misled about the condition of their daughter, who was reported as unwell before being found dead under suspicious circumstances. The family's legal counsel has urged the court to ensure that the investigation is conducted under judicial oversight to prevent any potential cover-ups.
As the investigation deepens, the court has ordered that Dr. Ghosh's statement be recorded and that he undergoes a polygraph test. This directive comes amidst growing suspicions about his role and the decisions made during his tenure at RG Kar Medical College. The court's insistence on a thorough investigation underscores the seriousness with which it views the case, particularly in light of the public outcry and the ongoing protests by doctors demanding accountability.
The outcome of the polygraph test and the subsequent findings of the investigation will likely play a crucial role in determining the course of justice in this deeply disturbing case. As the legal proceedings continue, the medical community and the general public remain on edge, awaiting answers and hoping for swift justice.
Dr. Ghosh's case has not only highlighted issues within the medical institutions but has also put the state's administrative decisions under scrutiny, raising questions about the potential for conflicts of interest and the integrity of the governance processes. The developments in this case are being closely monitored, with many hoping that the legal system will ensure that justice is served, and those responsible are held accountable.