Originally designed to enhance expertise within the government by allowing professionals from outside the traditional civil service route to occupy key positions, the lateral entry policy has faced increasing opposition. Critics argue that the move could diminish opportunities for candidates from marginalized communities, particularly in terms of reservation benefits.
The decision to reconsider the policy comes after prominent political figures voiced concerns. Rahul Gandhi, a leading figure in the Congress party, labeled the policy as a direct attack on the reservation system, accusing the government of attempting to dilute affirmative action provisions. Similar sentiments were echoed by Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leaders, who urged the Centre to abandon the policy, warning it could lead to further marginalization of underrepresented groups.
The Modi government, which initially defended the policy as a necessary step towards modernizing the bureaucracy, appears to be softening its stance in response to the backlash. Reports indicate that the revised approach will now include additional safeguards to ensure that the reservation system is not compromised, while still attempting to integrate external expertise into the civil service.
This shift marks a significant moment in the ongoing debate over the balance between meritocracy and affirmative action within India's public sector. While the government continues to advocate for bringing in specialists to drive efficiency and innovation, it faces the challenge of addressing the deep-seated concerns surrounding social equity.
As the government navigates these complexities, the future of the lateral entry policy remains uncertain, with further consultations likely to shape its final form. This development underscores the broader tensions within Indian politics, where efforts to reform and modernize must continually align with the principles of social justice and inclusion.