The techie recounted his tenure at a Canadian firm, where he reported to two female managers—one Canadian, the other American. He described them as "wonderful souls" who exhibited genuine concern for their team's well-being, encompassing health, family, and work environment. He emphasized the absence of any racial bias, noting, "I never once felt any hint of racism from them."
These managers, he elaborated, ensured that workloads were manageable and valued employee input. Their leadership fostered a positive atmosphere that motivated him to voluntarily extend his working hours when necessary. "I was even happy to work an extra hour or two sometimes because of her," he remarked, highlighting gestures like distributing Amazon gift cards and company-branded t-shirts as tokens of appreciation.
The situation shifted when he transitioned to a new role under an Indian manager based in the U.S. Within the first week, he perceived a stark contrast in management style, describing his new supervisor as "egoistic" and dismissive. He felt subjected to authoritative behavior, lacking mutual respect, which led him to contemplate resignation after receiving his initial paycheck.
Seeking insight, he posed a question to the Reddit community: "Is it common that Indian managers are the worst?" This inquiry resonated with many, prompting a wave of responses from individuals sharing similar experiences. One commenter stated, "Indian managers who migrated to the US on-site are the worst type of manager you could get." Another added, "There may be a few good Indian managers, but most of them are difficult to work with."
The discussion also touched upon cultural differences in workplace dynamics. Some users suggested that certain Indian managers might perpetuate hierarchical and authoritative practices prevalent in their home country, which can clash with the more egalitarian and collaborative environments typical in Western workplaces.
In a more troubling revelation, the techie claimed that one of his previous managers had disclosed that some employers prefer hiring Indians because they believe it allows them to impose heavier workloads. "One manager even told me that hiring Indians often means they can impose more work or 'slavery,' as they put it, because Indians are less likely to push back or say no," he alleged.