Naik, a polarizing figure in the global Muslim community, has faced widespread criticism for his conservative religious views and interpretations. His position on the nomenclature for orphaned girls has been condemned by some activists as an affront to the dignity of vulnerable children. Critics argue that labeling orphaned girls differently perpetuates gender inequality and marginalization, particularly in traditional societies where social hierarchies are already deeply entrenched.
While Zakir Naik is known for his puritanical interpretations of Islamic law, he has been banned in several countries, including India, Bangladesh, and the UK, for promoting hate speech and allegedly inciting violence. His visit to Pakistan, his first in three decades, has prompted concerns from social activists and intellectuals, who believe his teachings could exacerbate existing sectarian divides in a country grappling with religious extremism. Despite these apprehensions, Naik’s following in Pakistan remains substantial, and his lectures attract large crowds.
The issue Naik raised regarding orphaned girls falls within his broader conservative ideology, which has been criticized for limiting the role and rights of women in society. The Islamic preacher insists that religious terminology must be adhered to strictly, arguing that calling orphaned girls "daughters" contravenes Islamic jurisprudence. This stance, however, has provoked a backlash, with human rights advocates pushing back against what they describe as harmful rhetoric. They claim it could have adverse psychological effects on children and hinder their emotional and social integration.
This latest controversy is not an isolated incident in Naik's career. Over the years, he has been associated with several contentious remarks on gender roles, religious minorities, and interfaith relations. Although Naik has repeatedly denied allegations of promoting violence, his critics maintain that his sermons contribute to a growing climate of intolerance and division in societies already grappling with religious conflict. In Pakistan, where sectarian tensions run high, the arrival of a figure like Naik has led to renewed concerns about the potential for increased polarization.
Naik’s statement has also drawn the attention of feminist groups in Pakistan, who argue that it underscores the need for more inclusive interpretations of religious texts. These groups advocate for the recognition of orphaned girls as full and equal members of society, deserving of the same love, care, and protection as any biological daughter. They contend that Naik’s views are out of touch with modern values and that his influence could set back efforts to promote gender equality in Pakistan.
International observers have also raised concerns over Pakistan's decision to host Naik. Given his history of inflammatory rhetoric, his presence in the country could undermine efforts to foster social harmony and tolerance. Some analysts have speculated that Naik’s visit may be politically motivated, as the Pakistani government seeks to appease more conservative factions within its electorate. However, this approach risks alienating moderate voices and further entrenching radicalism.