This marks the first time in a decade that a Leader of the Opposition attended the event, as the post had been vacant for ten years. Despite the speculations, sources close to the matter emphasized that Gandhi did not request a change in his seating, debunking claims of any deliberate attempt to undermine his status.
The Ministry of Defence also issued a statement clarifying that the seating arrangement followed standard protocol, considering the presence of various dignitaries, ministers, and officials. The controversy has led to discussions about the significance of seating positions at national events, particularly for opposition leaders.
This incident has drawn attention to the broader issue of protocol and its interpretation, especially in a politically charged atmosphere. While some see it as a slight against the opposition, others argue that the arrangement was routine and in line with the norms observed at such events.
Gandhi's attendance was notable, especially since the opposition had boycotted the Independence Day celebrations for the past decade. His presence this year, despite the seating controversy, has been seen as a positive gesture towards fostering political unity.
The debate over the seating arrangement continues to fuel discussions across the political spectrum, with various interpretations being offered. However, the official stance remains that the seating was handled according to established procedures, with no intention of disrespect towards the opposition leader.
This incident highlights the sensitivity surrounding protocol at high-profile events, where even seemingly minor details can become the subject of intense public and political scrutiny.