Three UPSC aspirants lost their lives in a flooded coaching center in Old Rajinder Nagar. The Delhi High Court sharply criticized local authorities, attributing the tragedy to poor infrastructure and inadequate tax collection influenced by the 'freebies culture.' The court's remarks came during a plea for a high-level investigation committee into the incident.
Judge Rajesh Bindal emphasized the government's failure to ensure proper drainage systems, calling the incident a "preventable disaster." The court highlighted that the lack of basic infrastructure in an area known for its dense population of students and coaching centers is unacceptable.
The tragic incident occurred during heavy rainfall, which led to severe flooding in several parts of Delhi, including Old Rajinder Nagar. The coaching center, situated in a basement, quickly filled with water, trapping the students inside. Despite efforts by local residents and emergency services, the three aspirants could not be rescued in time.
The court pointed to the broader issue of urban planning and infrastructure in Delhi. It noted that while authorities have been generous in distributing subsidies and free services, there has been a significant neglect in developing and maintaining essential public services. Judge Bindal remarked, "The culture of distributing freebies has overshadowed the necessity of building a robust infrastructure."
The court has demanded a detailed report from the municipal corporation and other relevant authorities, focusing on why adequate drainage systems were not in place and what steps are being taken to prevent such incidents in the future. The judge has also urged the Delhi government to reassess its priorities and ensure that basic infrastructure is not compromised in the name of populism.
In the aftermath of the incident, there has been an outpouring of grief and anger among the student community in Old Rajinder Nagar. Many have voiced concerns about the safety standards in coaching centers, particularly those located in basements, which are prone to flooding.
Experts in urban planning and public policy have echoed the court's concerns. Dr. Sunita Narain, a prominent environmentalist, pointed out that Delhi's drainage system is severely outdated and unable to cope with the city's rapid urbanization. She stressed the need for a comprehensive overhaul of the city's infrastructure to prevent such tragedies.
The Delhi government has announced compensation for the families of the deceased students and has promised a thorough investigation into the incident. However, activists and local residents have called for more than just financial aid, demanding long-term solutions to the city's infrastructure problems.
As the investigation proceeds, the focus remains on holding accountable those responsible for the lapses that led to the tragedy. The court's criticism has sparked a broader debate on the governance and priorities of the local authorities, with many calling for a shift from short-term populist measures to sustainable urban development.
This incident serves as a grim reminder of the consequences of neglecting essential public infrastructure. The Delhi High Court's intervention is a step towards ensuring that such tragedies do not recur, urging the authorities to prioritize the safety and well-being of its citizens over political expediency.